Lines 1 - 3 |
Lines 1 - 17 |
|
++ Introduction |
|
|
|
For redesigning something, it helps to write things down. The question is: Do we want to redesign? Or do we want to add more and more stuff, so the forums would grow organically on demand? |
|
|
|
Do we need any "growth rules"? Or do we simply do what looks promising right now? |
|
|
|
|
|
++ To contribute |
|
|
|
...you only need to login here and press the "Edit" link. All changes are logged, so if you mess up something that's not a problem at all. |
|
|
|
This page isn't linked from anywhere but the phpWebSite Support Moderators-Forums. |
|
|
|
|
++ Current |
++ Current |
|
|
To redesign something, one must understand the current way things are. Let's have a look. |
To redesign something, one must understand the current way things are. Let's have a look. |
Lines 73 - 75 |
Lines 87 - 176 |
|
|
|
|
+++ phpWebSite versions 0.8.x-x |
+++ phpWebSite versions 0.8.x-x |
|
|
|
there are exactly three posts in here, the latest being from 2004. Support for 0.8 is officially closed down. |
|
|
|
|
|
+++ Forum developement |
|
|
|
* Public Discussion |
|
* Moderator's Lounge |
|
|
|
|
|
The Public Discussion forum isn't as well accepted as the other forums, if one has a look at the postcounts and dates. On the other hand, things are often enough written down to the point. |
|
|
|
There's also an interesting statement I just read [http://www.phpwsforums.com/showthread.php?t=1480 about general PWS-support]: |
|
|
|
"(...)surely one well-publicised and well-structured forum should suffice"? |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
++ Suggestions |
|
|
|
There already where a couple of suggestions pointed out since the start back in October 2004. Please add the ones I forgot: |
|
|
|
* "phpWebSite versions 0.8.x-x" -- should it be scrapped? (Xirocco) |
|
* "Windows support forum" -- do we need a dedicated forum for Windows? (SharonRenshaw) |
|
* "Restructuring" -- can we make the forum structure less ambigious and more compact? (ReneKiesler) |
|
* "Tagging" -- How about introducing per-post categories as well? (TonOosterhoff) |
|
|
|
|
|
++ Current Problems |
|
|
|
The current structure of the support forums has a couple of limitations. There is no clear expansion path. If we have a new forum, do we really add a "for phpWebSite" to it? Or is that obvious by people being on the phpWebSite support site? |
|
|
|
If a forum is within a "phpWebSite versions 0.9.x-x" forum, do we really need to repeat that information by calling the contained forums "Something 0.9.x-x"? |
|
|
|
Where's the difference between Help and Open Discussion? The level of urgency? |
|
|
|
Did phpWebSite from a users point of view change between 0.9, 0.10 and 0.10.1? Why do we want to differentiate that? |
|
|
|
|
|
++ Proposals |
|
|
|
+++ 4 Categories (instead of 6): |
|
|
|
* Announcements |
|
* Getting started |
|
* "Living with phpWebSite" |
|
* Lounge |
|
|
|
|
|
+++ Announcements |
|
|
|
* Modules (tagged by Appstate / Third party) |
|
* Security |
|
* Support Forums |
|
|
|
|
|
+++ Getting started |
|
|
|
The place where all the newbies should come. I'm not too sure about the structure, but maybe: |
|
|
|
* Evaluation ("Will phpWebSite work for me?") |
|
* Installation / Configuration (tagged by Windows / Unix / Other) |
|
* FAQs |
|
|
|
Unix would not only include Linux, but Solaris, AIX and so on as well. |
|
|
|
I think, the locking down of the FAQs is a very good idea, we should keep it that way. |
|
|
|
|
|
+++ Living with phpWebSite |
|
|
|
* Themes (tagged by Question / Offer) |
|
* Modules (tagged by Article Manager / Branch / Menu / ... what else?) |
|
* Professional Consulting |
|
* Developement |
|
* Everything else |
|
|
|
Note, that we don't differentiate between the urgency-level here. Also, it should be clear where people put their stuff. If not, it's back to the drawing-board again. |
|
|
|
+++ Lounge |
|
|
|
* Moderators |
|
* Off-Topic |
|
* Designer's Gallery |
|
* Suggestions for this forum |
|
|
|
|